Skip to content

AI Use Guide for Lithuanian schools

LT

Text size

Theme

Language

Lietuvių English

Home About and terms of use

Chapters

1 About this guide and how to use it
2 Summary for school leadership
3 Core principles
4 AI in schools: opportunities, risks and what research shows
5 What already exists in Lithuania
6 The legal framework: an overview
7 The EU Artificial Intelligence Act in schools
8 Personal data and the GDPR
9 Children’s data and children’s rights
10 Use of AI in teachers’ work
11 AI and student assessment
12 Student use of AI
13 Declaring AI use
14 Academic integrity
15 Hallucinations and fact-checking
16 Copyright
17 Cybersecurity
18 Deepfakes and misuse of AI
19 Evaluating AI vendors and tools
20 Major AI service vendors
21 Local and private AI solutions
22 Shadow AI
23 The AI tool register
24 Data protection impact assessment (DPIA)
25 Incident management
26 Responsibilities and governance
27 AI literacy for staff
28 AI literacy for students
29 What has changed, what is happening and what lies ahead
30 Practical situations
31 Decision tree: “Can I use AI for this?”
32 Implementation plan

Appendices

P1 10 rules for using AI in school
P2 What the school principal needs to do about AI
P3 Student AI use declaration
P4 Task AI mode cards
P5 AI tool register template
P6 New AI tool application and evaluation sheet
P7 AI incident report form
P8 Glossary
P9 Key legal provisions
P10 IT settings checklist
P11 Comparison of the ŠMSM guidelines and this guide

Home › Chapters

Chapter 30~7 min read

Practical situations

Each situation states whether the action is allowed, what the risks are and what a safer option would be.

In this chapter

1. A teacher wants to give ChatGPT 25 students’ essays and ask it to mark them
2. A class teacher wants AI to write a letter to parents about a conflict between two students
3. A special educator wants AI to draw up an individual education plan from a Pedagogical Psychological Service (PPT) assessment
4. The school psychologist wants to transcribe counselling sessions with an AI app on their phone
5. A VGK meeting on Teams is recorded and AI prepares the minutes
6. The deputy principal for education wants AI to identify “at-risk” students from grades and attendance
7. A gymnasium is considering an AI tool to rank applicants for gymnasium year I
8. A vendor offers a remote test monitoring system with “attention analysis”
9. A communications specialist wants AI to “touch up” event photos with students or to generate a photo of the event
10. The accountant receives a voice message in the “principal’s” voice about an urgent payment to a new supplier
11. Students have created a sexualised deepfake of a classmate and are sharing it in a chat group
12. An AI content detector shows that a student’s essay is “87% AI-generated”
13. A student uses AI translation for English homework
14. Students use AI to write code in an informatics project
15. The IT specialist wants to enable Microsoft 365 Copilot for all staff with access to all organisational documents
16. A teacher has installed a browser extension that promises “AI help with writing emails”
17. The IT specialist pasted a configuration file with a password into AI to find an error
18. For a year, a teacher has been managing class lists and grades with a personal ChatGPT account
19. The administration has received a complaint from parents and wants AI to prepare a reply
20. A primary teacher wants Year 2 students to chat with a chatbot on their own
21. The principal wants to install an AI chatbot for parents on the school website

Previous 29. What has changed, what is happening and what lies ahead Next 31. Decision tree: “Can I use AI for this?”

↑↓ select Enter open Esc close

In this chapter